Monday 11 June 2012

Final Overview of JOUR1111 Semester

Hello readers!

Well sadly, the semester of JOUR1111 has come to an end and I will commemorate it with this- my last blog post :)

I have really enjoyed the semester of Journalism and Communication, primarily because of the large amounts of content I have learned along the way.

Topics which I found particularly interesting to learn about were investigative journalism, commercial media and picture stories. The assessment pieces which I enjoyed completing the most were the factual storytelling exercise because my topic was my mum and this blog because I really liked reflecting each week on the lecture and things I thought were useful or worthy of sharing.

In terms of the construction of the course, I wouldn't change anything, I thought all the lecture topics were extremely relevant to budding journalists and the tutorials were correctly spaced out with lots of content to cover.

Finally, this course has enabled me to improve my creative writing skills and expanded my knowledge of all topics which are crucial to journalists today. I look forward to using these skills in whichever career path I choose to take.

Thank you for reading my blog, I hope you enjoyed reading it as much as I enjoyed writing!


Sunday 10 June 2012

A real world example of news values and agenda setting!

Hello everyone!

I am sorry I haven't blogged anything in a while, I have been very busy with university assessment and planning holidays!

Today I wanted to share with my readers a really interesting article which I think exemplifies the concepts of agenda setting and news values.

This article, published in The Australian media section on the website, describes how channel 9, a free-to-air broadcasting channel deciding to not air the final of the French Open but instead wants to air the finale of the show The Voice. Their reasons for this is because the Voice has higher ratings and it is not in their best interest to air half a game.





In relation to this article relating to the content we learned about agenda setting and news values is that channel 9 has clearly chosen a show which will make them the most money out of advertisements and highest ratings. Furthermore, the Voice has news values which are evidently, more important to them as a company rather than the French Open final.

I thought this article was interesting to see how the concepts learnt in the lectures and tutorials are played out in a real-life example by a high profile broadcasting company.

Below is the link to the article to view.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/media/nine-delays-french-open-final/story-e6frg996-1226391244500

Enjoy!!

Thursday 31 May 2012

A very controversial topic

Hi everyone!

Today I was browsing through Media Watch's website and I came across this segment they did on the News of the World scandal. I thought this segment was very insightful and interesting to see all the different newspapers and their perspectives on the News of The World scandal. I also liked how it was related back to Australia and our media.




Whilst it did occur last year, I am amazed at the actions of the News of the World and I think this controversy is an example of the lack of ethics and regard for law in this case, in journalism in this generation.

I am amazed at how journalists believe hacking phones and voice messages is ethical or acceptable for a story!

Below is the link to the episode, it is a very good deconstruction of the media frenzy surrounding the scandal.

http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s3266976.htm

Monday 28 May 2012

Journalism Lecture 12- Guest Speaker-Steve Molk

Hello everyone!

Today's lecture was the last one for the semester. Bruce brought in the guest speaker, Steve Molk. He is an entertainment blogger and has been for two years now. I thought what Steve had to say was really helpful and relevant to students studying journalism currently. He had a couple of great messages and bits of advice which really opened up my thoughts as to the way I approach my journalism studies.

Steve said that if you want to be a journalist, you are able to control your brand starting now. You are able to determine what you do with your brand, how you make it work for you and what it will mean for you in the long run.

When it comes to getting a job, the opportunities for employment are far greater if you can shape the internet media to make yourself the writer you want to be. Through getting a journalism degree, you are able to prove to the employer that you know what media is present and that you have the knowledge to use it in a multitude of ways. These skills make you as an employee, much better off.

When it comes to blogging, which is what Steve does as a career, he says that is is relatively young in terms of mainstream media but is becoming more important in determining how the public receive information and how we process it. For example, in places like China and Korea, the public are not able to access social networking because governments don't want their citizens knowing anything. However, in Australia we are very lucky because we are able to say what we want, do what we want and communicate how we see fit.

Blogging is not only being able to consistently work on the area of writing which you find the most fascinating but also you are able to connect to a subculture of people, the international market, fans of the area of which you write, all whilst your skills as a writer improve. It is essentially the new media form for students and journalists because we are no longer locked behind what the "media machine"tells us.

Another bonus feature about social media and in particular, Twitter, is that you can access all sorts of people in the public eye such as politicians, entertainers, artists without having to go through their PR team and agent. To find out the real story, you don't have to merely trust mainstream media but you are able to go straight to the source which creates or controls the news. This information can then be transformed into an exclusive story.

Steve said that his favourite thing to blog is about TV, and this is what he is most interested in. He admits he loves to sit around and watch TV. Thus, he is able to take information and interact with people because everyone has an opinion on TV. Although people criticise Twitter, Steve says he enjoys communicating with people and he likes to hear what people thing about what he writes and what he does as publisher. It is his choice of personal media domain because he likes the 140 character restriction on each Tweet because it forces you to be succinct and tell the main parts.

Steve reiterates that if you want to be a journalist, the opportunity is right now to show the future employer what type of journalist you are. There are lots of opportunities in journalism and all of them stem from what you do now or how you write and control the story. The chance to become a paid journalist and to be able to pitch the story in the direction you want started before you even signed up for this course.

The beauty of social media is that you have the opportunity to talk to future employers, producers, directors or your favourite writer instantly.

What Steve enjoys about Twitter the most is that it is very noisy sometimes after a big story has just broke and lots of people will tell you what they thought about something and then information will occur as a result. Journalists love Twitter because it spreads news instantly.

Steve personally became a media writer after a mid-life crisis. He says that there is a very narrow segment of media writing in Australia. If you want to get any information, the best place is from the The Australian media diary and the people who write for Fairfax. Recently, Fairfax media are using his writing and he is doing radio spots. thus his audience has opened up.

The most important message Steve gave is that the way we understand how information is given to us and the way we interpret the information presented to us, will impact the kind of journalists we become.


I liked listening to Steve talk about his career as a blogger because it opened my eyes to the instant possibilities of journalist online and in social media networks which weren't available 10 years ago. 
·       

Thursday 24 May 2012

Annotated Bibliography


JOUR1111 Annotated Bibliography


White, A. (2008). To Tell You The Truth The Ethical Journalism Initiative. Belgium: International Federation of Journalists.

The author, Aidan White, currently a Director of the Coalition for Ethical Journalism, is able to apply his decades of experience and knowledge to form the insightful Ethical Journalism Initiative. His past credentials as a journalist and General Secretary to the International Federation of Journalists provide his guidebook to ethics in journalism with plenty of reliability. The book’s foreword states that it aims to provide “support for journalists who are keeping an ethical flame alive in the profession” (White, 2008). White introduces the initiative with the Declaration of Principles on the Conduct of Journalists. He explains that one of the most controversial principles within the American Journalism industry involves the discrimination in the media towards minority interests. Furthermore, he demonstrates that the current challenge in American Journalism is that often, the opinions of minority interests are silenced for the concept of newsworthiness. White states, the ethics of journalism requires balance in documenting “political arguments so that a lively debate can take place” (White, 2008). The significant use of examples throughout the text provides the author’s views and ideas with credibility. This topic is closely linked with the significant announcement of President Barack Obama’s support for gay marriage, which has dominated the press in recent weeks. As White explains, a balance of information is lacking in the three different mediums of journalism commenting on the announcement, which are cited below. The similarities across the three articles can be equated to White’s publication as the political aspect of the announcement is at the forefront of the story rather than the interests of minority groups.

Gast, P. (2012). Obama announces he supports same-sex marriage. Retrieved from

American cable station, CNN, was able to broadcast to viewers ABC News’ exclusive interview with President Barack Obama. The announcement was presented in the format of a video and an accompanying article. Phil Gast, the author, applies his experience as a writer and editor for CNN, and delivers an extensive, political based article on Obama’s support for same-sex marriage. Gast introduces the issue with an explicit reference to the political stakes surrounding the announcement. This article holds many news values such as impact, audience identification, ethics, recency and elite nations. The author is careful not to reveal his personal opinion on the issue and the language used throughout is strictly factual and presents a balanced viewpoint. For these reasons, the credibility of the article increases. Gast effectively refers to several highly reliable sources throughout the article, such as President Barack Obama, political opposition Mitt Romney, university professor John Green along with multiple sources from both sides of the issue. A significant difference between the CNN article and text articles is that the television segment serves its purpose and delivers the message clearly and succinctly to viewers. Considering CNN’s extensive broadcasting history, its target audience is the opinionated American who expects all the vital statistics and implications of the issue. The cable station delivers the message in a prompt and succinct manner to access the majority of viewers. The CNN article can be likened to the previous piece written by Aidan White as the political aspect of the issue is discussed for the majority of the article, whereas the implications for same-sex couples are virtually unmentioned.

Jan, T., Viser, M., & Borcher, C. (2012). President Obama announces support for gay marriage in reversal of prior stance. Retrieved from

Tracy Jan, Matt Viser and Callum Borchers, all political reporters for The Boston Globe, present an accurate article of the announcement for the support of gay marriage by Barack Obama. Despite the author’s credentials, the scope of the issue is dealt with fairly effectively as the majority of the emphasis is placed on the implications of the statement itself, with a minor section devoted to the political campaign. Due to this, the article’s credibility is enhanced; this is then accompanied by balanced and informative language, which is implemented throughout. As a result, assumptions made on behalf of the journalists are minimal. Furthermore, multiple reputable sources are cited throughout the piece; quotes from Obama, Romney, and Obama’s campaign adviser David Axelrod are frequently mentioned. Whilst this particular piece is solely text based, its purpose is served, as the information is very factual and informative. The target audience for the website, boston.com, would be traditional Americans and due to the fact that Massachusetts is one state which has legalized gay marriage, part of the focus was placed on the political implications of the announcement. Although less emphasis was placed on the implications of the announcement of same-sex couples, one credible source was succinctly referred to, broadening the pieces’ coverage of the issue. Thus, in cohesion with the CNN article and White’s initiative, the effects of Obama’s announcement on the political campaign is dealt with, with one reference explicitly citing the implication on minority interests. This further reiterates the lack of exposure on minority groups in American journalism.

Calmes, J., & Baker, P. (2012, May 9). Obama Says Same-Sex Marriage Should Be Legal. The New York Times. Retrieved from

Jackie Calmes and Peter Baker, regular contributors of The New York Times, bring years of experience to present a detailed portrayal of the issue. The article was featured on the front page of the print New York Times for May 9, 2012. The authors examine President Obama’s announcement of support for same-sex marriage with precise facts regarding the declaration itself, whilst also delivering extensive information about the surrounding circumstances prior to the announcement and after. As a result of this, Calmes and Baker’s credibility is amplified, as the details given were relevant, descriptive and demonstrated with factual language. Furthermore, the author’s positions on the issue were undetectable and for this reason, no assumptions were made on behalf of the journalists. Although Calmes and Baker’s referral to external sources is limited to President Obama, the author’s citation to the Democrat of Massachusetts, Barney Frank, one of the first gay members of congress, is effective in demonstrating their ability to locate reputable sources to comment on the issue. The New York Times is the third most read newspaper in America, and thus the target audience for this article would be all Americans interested in the rights of minority groups (Shea, 2010). Thus, the newspaper delivered information, which was highly relevant and non-partisan. In contrast to White’s initiative and previous articles on this topic, Calmes and Baker’s article examines the ramifications of Obama’s announcement in itself, rather than commenting on the political campaign, which surrounds the issue.

 References

Calmes, J., & Baker, P. (2012, May 9). Obama Says Same-Sex Marriage Should Be Legal. The New York Times. Retrieved from

Gast, P. (2012). Obama announces he supports same-sex marriage. Retrieved from

Jan, T., Viser, M., & Borcher, C. (2012). President Obama announces support for gay marriage in reversal of prior stance. Retrieved from

Shea, D. (2010). Top 25 Newspapers By Circulation: Wall Street Journal Trounces USA Today. Retrieved from

White, A. (2008). To Tell You The Truth The Ethical Journalism Initiative. Belgium: International Federation of Journalists.





International story of the four Italian girls

This is a story which has dominated the press in recent weeks. The story involves four Italian girls who have run away to avoid being sent back to Italy to their "abusive" father.

Below is a link to an article which explains that the girls father says that the Australian press have distorted the truth. This article is an example of how journalists somehow publish accusations without getting confirmation from both sides of the story. It is an interesting read.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-05-24/italian-dad-at-centre-of-custody-battle-expresses-concern/4031468


Tuesday 22 May 2012

Something I am excited about!

Hello everyone!

I just wanted to share with the readers of my blog the Brisbane City Mini Mag for the Autumn season. It is something very exciting for me because my mother, my sister and myself feature on the cover!

I remember when we did the photoshoot for the feature, I was very surprised at the amount of time and effort it took for a photoshoot to take place. Despite this, I really enjoyed being able to spend the day with my mum and sister.

Here is the link to the magazine which you can virtually flick through or look through the The City's website to see all the amazing new events which are coming up in Brisbane.
http://www.bnecity.com.au/News/News-Article.aspx?id=22584&returnurl=~/News/Default.aspx



Thank you!!

Monday 21 May 2012

Journalism-Lecture 11- Investigative Journalism


Hello again! This week's journalism lecture was about investigative journalism and all things surrounding it!

To start off, what is investigative journalism?

Well according to Wikipedia, it states, "Investigative journalism is a form of journalism in which reporters deeply investigate a single topic of interest, often involving crime, political corruption, or corporate wrongdoing". This definition is pretty self-explanatory.
 One we were shown in the lecture which I liked was it was defined as, "“what somebody, somewhere wants to suppress; all the rest is just advertising". Bruce also said that all good journalism should to some extent, be investigative journalism- to discover the truth and identify any lapses in it.  
We then talked about what Bruce called the In’s of investigative journalism.

They are 
-  intelligent- it has to be well thought out before you go into somebody life and you must know what you are looking for, money, sex and power comes up in investigative journalism, weigh all the facts intelligently
-  informed- know the facts to the story, know which people are involved and who you suspect is pulling the strings. If you don't you will miss out on the real story. 
-  intuitive- become more experienced, be able to rely on your gut,  be able to ask yourself- is this an unsafe situation, does this story have some legs, is it dangerous to me or other people? After some experience you will be able to go with your gut.
 - inside- get inside info, get the inside story, what a journalist needs most from participants is your trust because they are bearing their lives to you and telling you information that could destroy them. You must know what is going on
- invest- this refers to investing a lot of yourself, it is difficult and it costs money and time, sometimes your mental health is at stake, it can be very tricky and serious, put something of yourself in there, in some situations people don’t talk to you again when you have broken the story 

Now onto some deeper definitions & purpose of investigative journalism. 

-  critical and thorough journalism
  critical=the journalist is an active participant,
 “active intervention”- the key idea,
thorough=journalist makes a substantial effort
-  Custodians of conscious= “exposure” is the key idea, 
“investigation takes society’s morals and norms and holds breaches up to pubic scrutiny" E.g. Fitzgerald inquiry
- To provide a voice to those without one and to hold the powerful to account
= social justice-power to the powerless, voice to the voiceless e.g. KONY 2012
" public interest is key idea", great responsibility
-  fourth estate/fourth branch of government/watchdog
- fourth estate= “journalists represent the interests of those without power to balance the power of government” 
fourth branch of government= journalists ensure free flows of information necessary for the functioning of democracy by interrogating the judiciary executive, and legislature= agenda setting
 
 watchdog= journalists make accountable public personalities, and institution whose functions impact social and political life

Some common sayings in the industry
-  ‘shoe leather’ –USA= find out what’s going on, talk to people
-  standing back (BIG PIC)- not involves the little things but how does this to relate
-  skeptical not cynical- is the attitude to have!
 

 Cutting through the agenda-  
John Pilger “It is not enough for journalists to see themselves as mere messengers without understanding the hidden agendas of the message and the myths that surround it.”   
Some historical trailblazers in investigative journalism are 
-  “the Sydney monitor” (1826) Edward Hall Smith. This case shows how long the history of investigative journalism is in Australia. 
-  “the maiden tribute of modern Babylon” campaign (1885) W.T Stead & the Salvos (William Booth)
 – created a sting- age of consent raised from 12 to 16 – big effect
-  Bob Woodward-Carl Bernstein 1972-74 “Watergate”- Nixon resigned
- Chris Masters, Phil Dickie, Shaun Hoyt, “The Moonlight State”- 2 years researching for 1 hour of television
- Julian Assange (and others) “WikiLEAKS”



Following this, a question was posed to us. Is Wikileaks journalism?
To which the answer is no!
 It is just a bunch of information and data and it needs journalists to sort through it.
 
 Investigative trailblazers 
What do all these investigations have in common? 
=making information available that other people don’t want known and they are changing the world, for example bringing down presidents or governments

Some examples of local investigate journalism are the  
 - the global mail 
-  crikey
- Australian story
  

What do we investigate? 
Old journalism saying:
  “if your mother says she loves you, check it out” 
This quote means that you should always check your facts, assume nothing, expect whistleblowers to be/go crazy 

Types of investigative interaction
-  Interviews- whistleblowers, people concerned,

-  observations- see what’s going on, don’t get it second hand
-  documents- important, online or annual reports
-  briefings- by officials
-  leaks- whistleblowers,

-  trespass- up to your morals, depends on your boss
-  theft
 

 investigate methods
-  interviewing- numerous interviews
-  observing- technical issues, scrutiny of government

-  analysing documents- law suits, law docs, tax records




  Threats to investigative journalism
-Online news, less money less time and therefore less investigative work. 


Also the great debate between Journalism and PR provides a threat towards journalism. 



Mostly for these reasons.. 

A very interesting book I found when searching through the internet was this one on the history of investigative journalism and how it has differed through cultures. 


http://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=JMhmwt6h6G0C&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=investigative+journalism&ots=OXEquZ_gRj&sig=vziHUUgG6W_K4TBT8hKk8nuI3Vo#v=onepage&q=investigative%20journalism&f=false

Overall, I enjoyed this lecture because I thought we could relate it more practically to the industry itself and it is easier to see examples of investigative journalism happening every day. I really enjoyed learning about what it takes and the different facets of it. 

Monday 14 May 2012

Journalism-Lecture 10-Agenda Setting

Today's lecture was all about agenda setting in the media. We started off the discussion with a youtube clip essentially poking fun at the stereotypical video reports which are constantly seen on television and media shows.

When defining what is agenda setting, Bruce told us that like all good theories, it is obvious!

In my opinion, I believe that agenda setting is the process which certain issues are presented in the media, some more so than others to receive  more important or less feedback.




There are several types of agenda setting.. These are as follows,

1. The public agenda- topics seen as important by the public 
2. Policy agenda-issues that decision makers that are salient
3. Corporate agenda-issues that big businesses consider important
4. Media agenda-issues discussed in the media
All of these types are interrelated!

We have to come to terms with the fact that in this day and age, the media shape the way we look at things or at issues, and they are able to tend importance to certain media exposure on certain issues.

The two basic assumptions of media agenda settings are that the mass media do not merely reflect and report reality but they also filter and shape reality. 

 Media concentration on a few issues leads public to perceive those issues as more important than other issues, this is the main purpose of agenda setting and the essential definition. 

On to the question of where did agenda setting actually come from?
A statement by Walter Lippmann which I liked was that mass media creates images of events in our minds. I liked this because it resonated with me and I thought it really made sense and sums up photo-journalism. 
Another quote by Lippmann is that, “propaganda is used as tool to help shape images in the minds of human beings in support of enterprise, idea or group. Propaganda can be used to substitute one social pattern for another”. Moreover, he argued that people rely on images in their mind to form judgement rathe than critically think. 

When asking why the media set agenda, the answer is simply, because they can!

A good example of agenda setting in the media is the O.J Simpson trial as the media controlled what people thought about the case. 

 The agenda setting family 
1. media gatekeeping- how individuals control the flow of messages through a communication channel, the exposure of an issue, what the media chooses to reveal to the public. E.g rubert Murdoch

2. Media advocacy- the purposive promotion of a message e.g. health through the media

3. Agenda cutting- most of the truth or reality that is going on in the world isn’t represented, issues like AIDS take a backseat to Justin Bieber’s new haircut, because aids doesn’t get as much time in the media, the issue is cared about less

4. Agenda surfing or bandwagon effect- the media follows the crowd and trends, the media surfs on the wave of topics originally mentioned in the opinion leading media, bandwagon effects-how existing public opinion influences others toward that opinion. E.g. kony 2012 

5. The diffusion of news- the process through which an important event is communicated to the public. How, where, when, news is released. who decides? E.g. osama bin laden death

6. Portrayal of an issue- talk about different aspects of an issue like aboriginal youth , depends on agenda – the way the issue is portrayed will often influence how it is perceived by the public, different media outlets with different portrayals can cause the public to formulate their own perception

7. Media dependence- the more dependant a person is on the media for information, the more susceptible that person is to media agenda setting, the most common media dependency is Facebook/twitter. It has become a way of life!

Another interesting fact about agenda setting is now there is new prime times rather than years ago the news was released early in the morning of one day and the next edition doesn’t appear until 24 hours later. Now, there are 24/7 outlets constantly reporting, and it has been said that there are three prime times for news.. - first thing in the morning- new primetime, traffic, accidents, lunch time, 12-2pm, and another 3pm- people have a coffee and biscuit and they check the news again.



I liked this lecture because it turned my attention to the media and how much they can control the importance or significance of an issue or block an issue out depending on their preferences. 


I also came across this youtube video explaining the agenda setting theory. I thought it explained it very clearly and made it easy to understand.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbCYr-U7MAQ


Tuesday 8 May 2012

An Interesting Article...

Today, I was just looking through the news websites to catch up on what has been happening and I came across this article on ninemsn.

It is basically about how an online holiday company used Maddie McCann's photo to promote their holiday spot, which happens to be in close proximity to where she disappeared.
It also comments on how the parents of Maddie feel about the website.
In my opinion, I believe this is terribly disrespectful to Maddie's family given the circumstances and I think it is another example of how the lines of ethics with media and journalism are being blurred.

I think the story of Maddie McCann is a tragic, but fascinating story. I hope there is closure to this ongoing debacle sometime soon.

Here is the link, take a look for yourself.

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=8464418

Monday 30 April 2012

Journalism-Lecture 9-News Values

Today's lecture was based around news values in the journalism industry. 


News Values can be defined as, "the degree of prominence a media outlet gives to a story and the attention that is paid by an audience". So it is essentially how stories are written and how they are marketed to the audience and then how the readers respond to that piece.


An interesting question involving this topic is how do you choose which will be the lead story on the news or in the newspapers or on television?


One quote which was really cool was" News is what a chap who doesn’t care much about anything wants to read. And its only news until he’s read it. After that its dead". Bruce said that this quote was really old but when you think about it, it is still really relevant to modern times. 


We were told that there are four factors which govern news values and they are  Impact, audience identification, pragmatics and source influence. Impact refers to anything that makes reader surprised or excited or impressed. Audience identification refers to the readers wanting to know what is going on and feeling a sense of ownership and pragmatics refers to ethics and current affairs. Finally, source influence basically means PR and how it is becoming more prominent with journalism.  


We were then posed a question; · are news values the same across different news services? Are news values the same across different countries/cultures? And the answer was no!! News values are very different across cultures and countries. It is very much subjective, however there are some exceptions.


The two slogans "If it bleeds, it leads" or "If its local, it leads are common predictors of what will govern the front page of the news. If it bleeds refers to anything relating to deaths of superstars, murders, car accidents or tragedies and if its local refers to floods, droughts, elections, sport or charity things. 







We were then introduced to the initial 12 factors of newsworthiness. They were  Negativity, closeness to home(proximity), recency, currency, continuity, uniqueness, simplicity, personality, expectedness, elite nations of people, exclusivity, and size.




However, from that point on there have been people who have reduced the factors to less and added in some new ones. For example, some are   drama, visual attractiveness, entertainment, importance, size, proximity, negativity, brevity, recency, elites and personalities. O'Neil and Harcup said that the most important factors were the power elite, celebrity, entertainment, surprise, bad news, good news, magnitude, relevance, follow-up and newspaper agenda


Murray Masterson narrowed it down to 6 news values which were significance, proximity, conflict, human interest, novelty and prominence. 






One of the main things I learnt from this lecture is how the factors of newsworthiness are constantly changing as time goes on and people can dictate what they think will make news to their own personal opinion.
I thought this lecture was interesting because of these factors and the different headlines for what makes a lead story. 


Below is a link to a website which states almost the exact same news values as was stated in the lecture but slightly less. Take a look. 


http://www.uncp.edu/home/acurtis/Courses/ResourcesForCourses/NewsValues.html




Thursday 26 April 2012

Factual Story Telling

The Success of Tengdahl Australia

The well-known Queensland designer, Julie Tengdahl has come a long way since her days in the small rural suburb of Canon Hill, Brisbane. From her years working in a bridal salon and as a fitness instructor to having three successful stores in Brisbane’s most engaging suburbs, Tengdahl reflects on her fashion-designing career. She admits it hasn’t been all glitz and glamour.

Fashion wasn’t always Tengdahl’s first choice when it came to her career. A determined student, she says that she can pinpoint the beginning of her career when she attended her college typing class in an outfit she had created herself the night before. Tengdahl recalls that as soon as she saw her teacher, she was told she was “in the wrong career” and that she “should be switching as soon as I can”. She explains that moment as starting her off into a completely different direction of where her career was heading.

Still 17 years old and living at home, whilst her mother was a talented dressmaker and a tremendous influence on her life, she had never considered a career in fashion. At the time, Tengdahl was working as a fitness instructor at the local gym. However, shortly after the “1980’s fitness boom” as she calls it, she began selling aerobic gear she had made herself. She explains this is where her flare for fashion began.
Tengdahl’s fashion career began with her work at bridal salon, Dion’s, while studying part-time at college. The experience enabled Tengdahl to discover her fascination for luxurious fabrics. She adds, “making bridal gowns gave me a really good grasp of couture because they were outfits for each individual woman”.

Inspired by the individuality, Tengdahl moved into the fitness industry, designing her own fitness brand labelled Sunfit, which consisted mainly of triathlon clothing.
Following this she moved into mainstream fashion, starting a business with her friend entitled Principles Pty Ltd. The partnership was a business-savvy match adding that her partner was “a model and very connected in the industry whilst I had the technical skills of sewing and an extensive knowledge of fabrics”. It was there that Tengdahl found her passion for designing mainstream fashion. She thought the fashion industry was lacking, and needed  “… a market for girls wanting an outfit that wasn’t a black suit…it was a very masculine world…there was only black and navy offered with a white shirt”. Tengdahl and her partner, who shared the same passion for dressing women, decided to design creative outfits with brighter colours, which were more fashion orientated.

  Despite their success, the partnership soon dissolved as Tengdahl recalls feeling unhappy with the direction of the label and feeling a shift in her own designing capabilities. Shortly after, at 32 years old, in a time where, “the designer was the brand and people had a direct connection with the designer ”, Tengdahl launched her self-titled business named Tengdahl Australia.  



Tengdahl in her designing showroom
Source: http://www.cairns.com.au/article/2009/08/22/59881_local-news.html


Whilst owning her own business can be very stressful at times, Tengdahl says that over the years, she has become accustomed to the chaos and calm nature of the industry. However, she does admit that, “It is stressful when I put a collection out and I put myself out there on the catwalk, that’s very exposing but also very challenging and rewarding”.

 An outfit from Tengdahl Australia
Source: http://tengdahl.com/portal/index.php
 Moreover, when asked where she gathers her inspiration from, she responds, “just being observant and looking at colours, street life…fashion is a reflection of your identity and an expression of your personality… so its about stepping back, viewing, soaking it up and creating it back into a garment”.

An outfit from Tengdahl Australia's previous collections
Source: http://tengdahl.com/portal/index.php

Every successful fashion designer has a purpose for his or her creations and Tengdahl is no different. She says it is “always to make women shine and feel beautiful, to produce beautiful pieces with integrity, act with integrity with my business skills and I think I’ve always done that which is why my brand is still successful”. 

In terms of her dream goal, Tengdahl says it has been the same as it always has been, to align with her purpose. To be, “successful, stay in the business, to love looking after women and making them shine, making them feel beautiful about themselves by putting a lovely garment on them and seeing how their chemistry changes by a new outfit”. 

Despite the international economic crisis, Tengdahl says she will make sure the future of her business does not suffer. Her future plans include, “building up a marketing strategy for an online business”. Due to the fact that Tengdahl may be one of the few brands that manufacture and retail in Brisbane, she hopes that, “continuing to work on creating beautiful clothing and an online business will open me up globally”.

When asked if Tengdahl thinks the fashion industry has changed over the years, the answer is a resounding yes. She adds, with the ever-expanding nature of the industry, the development of the online shopping phenomenon has opened the fashion industry up to the world as customers. On a more personal level, Tengdahl says that “…fashion keeps on evolving and each year you pick up things from the past… it’s about creating something new from things that have succeeded in the past”. According to Tengdahl, every designer should have a constant piece in his or her collection, which never goes out of style.

Furthermore, with the recent developments of the industry, Tengdahl says the future of the fashion industry will be online as well. Not only is the World Wide Web making fashion brands accessible to consumers in remote areas, but it is also providing small brands like Tengdahl Australia with the exposure they need. However, she adds, “fashion is about connection, people will still want to be connected to their local stores for the experience of shopping and the advice you receive from a retail assistant… retail will never be phased out”.

While there is no doubt that exciting things are on the horizon for this Brisbane designer, Tengdahl says her next collection will be focused around the upcoming trends. She adds that she is gathering inspiration from magazines and the Internet to deliver a collection with an “Italian feel of bright colours, flowing fabrics...whilst still taking shapes from previous collections”.

 Tengdahl has been extremely successful in her career, however she admits when she was younger; she never imagined her life would take this path.  “I wanted to be successful when I was young but at that point I didn’t know how I was going to be successful and how I was going to make my mark in the world,” Tengdahl says. She adds with a smile, “I’m really happy with what I have achieved, it has been far greater than my thoughts”.


Tuesday 24 April 2012

Journalism-Lecture 8 - Ethics

This week's lecture was all about ethics and how they can differ between people. We had a guest speaker come to talk to the group, his name was John Harrison and he had worked with Bruce in the past.

We started off the lecture with a picture of a ethics cross with the words good taste, bad taste, ethical and unethical around the quadrants.
We were then shown a series of 10 advertisements or television commercials and asked to rate them in the quadrants according to our feelings about them.
I thought some of them were unethical and inappropriate but some were good advertisements.
These are some examples that we were shown...


After we had finished scoring all of the examples we were then asked how to we distinguish between the good and the bad, the ethical and the unethical, the right from the wrong, the difference between the bad, the wrong and the simply tacky?
How do we work it out? After looking at the advertisements, more importantly who has the right to say if it is right or wrong, good or bad, ethical and unethical? 
Primarily because it seems like everyone has a different opinion and view on things.

We were then informed of the various ethical theories which were deontology, consequentialism and virtue. Deontology involves  rules, principles and duties. Principles such as you will do the right thing by following these rules, all ethics codes are deontological, and a choice between an absolute right and an absolute wrong. 

Consequentialism is about getting a 'good' or 'right' outcome that matters, doesn't matter how we got there, the end may justify the means, and the greatest good for the greatest number. 

Finally virtue ethics means that "goodness" comes from good habits or dispositions of character and these habits are 'virtues' such as courage, justice, temperance and prudence. 
These habits of character are in the 'golden mean' of behaviour. 

The mean, for example courage is the mean between rashness and cowardice. Justice is the mean between the in-justice of overzealous and excessive law and the injustice of lawlessness. 

There are several types of ethics codes. They include the MEAA code, the PRIA code, the AFA code and the AANA code. 
The main thing I learnt from this lecture is how different people's opinions can be in relation to ethics and how they are applied to real-life examples. 
I don't think ethics should be necessarily put into categories but everyone should be allowed to label something how they see it. 

Furthermore, considering ethics is such a controversial issue in journalism I looked into some websites  relating to ethics in journalism and their codes they abide by.

Below are some links to some interesting reads.



It is interesting because some websites share similar principles of ethics, whereas some have more or less codes to abide by.