Hello again! This week's journalism lecture was about investigative
journalism and all things surrounding it!
To start off, what is investigative journalism?
Well according to Wikipedia, it states, "Investigative journalism is a form of journalism in which
reporters deeply investigate a single topic of interest, often involving crime,
political corruption, or corporate wrongdoing". This definition is pretty
self-explanatory.
One we were shown in the
lecture which I liked was it was defined as, "“what somebody, somewhere
wants to suppress; all the rest is just advertising". Bruce also said that
all good journalism should to some extent, be investigative journalism- to
discover the truth and identify any lapses in it.
We then talked about what Bruce called the In’s of investigative
journalism.
They are
- intelligent- it has to be well thought out before you go into
somebody life and you must know what you are looking for, money, sex and power
comes up in investigative journalism, weigh all the facts intelligently
- informed- know the facts to the story, know which people are
involved and who you suspect is pulling the strings. If you don't you will miss
out on the real story.
- intuitive- become more experienced, be able to rely on your gut,
be able to ask yourself- is this an unsafe situation, does this story
have some legs, is it dangerous to me or other people? After some experience
you will be able to go with your gut.
- inside- get inside info, get the inside story, what a
journalist needs most from participants is your trust because they are bearing
their lives to you and telling you information that could destroy them. You
must know what is going on
- invest- this refers to investing a lot of yourself, it is
difficult and it costs money and time, sometimes your mental health is at
stake, it can be very tricky and serious, put something of yourself in there,
in some situations people don’t talk to you again when you have broken the
story
Now onto some deeper definitions & purpose of
investigative journalism.
- critical and thorough journalism
critical=the journalist is an active participant,
“active intervention”-
the key idea,
thorough=journalist makes a substantial effort
- Custodians of conscious= “exposure” is the key idea,
“investigation takes society’s morals and norms and holds breaches up to
pubic scrutiny" E.g. Fitzgerald inquiry
- To provide a voice to those without one and to hold the powerful to
account
= social justice-power to the powerless, voice to the voiceless e.g.
KONY 2012
" public interest is key idea", great responsibility
- fourth estate/fourth branch of government/watchdog
- fourth estate= “journalists represent the interests of those without
power to balance the power of government”
fourth branch of government= journalists ensure free flows of
information necessary for the functioning of democracy by interrogating the
judiciary executive, and legislature= agenda setting
watchdog= journalists make accountable public personalities, and
institution whose functions impact social and political life
Some common sayings in the industry
- ‘shoe leather’ –USA= find out what’s going on, talk to people
- standing back (BIG PIC)- not involves the little things but how
does this to relate
- skeptical not cynical- is the attitude to have!
Cutting through the agenda-
John Pilger “It is not enough for journalists to see themselves as mere
messengers without understanding the hidden agendas of the message and the
myths that surround it.”
Some historical trailblazers in investigative journalism are
- “the Sydney monitor” (1826) Edward Hall Smith. This case shows
how long the history of investigative journalism is in Australia.
- “the maiden tribute of modern Babylon” campaign (1885) W.T
Stead & the Salvos (William Booth)
– created a sting- age
of consent raised from 12 to 16 – big effect
- Bob Woodward-Carl Bernstein 1972-74 “Watergate”- Nixon resigned
- Chris Masters, Phil Dickie, Shaun Hoyt, “The Moonlight State”- 2
years researching for 1 hour of television
- Julian Assange (and others) “WikiLEAKS”
Following this, a question was posed to us. Is Wikileaks journalism?
To which the answer is no!
It is just a bunch of
information and data and it needs journalists to sort through it.
Investigative trailblazers
What do all these investigations have in common?
=making information available that other people don’t want known and
they are changing the world, for example bringing down presidents or
governments
Some examples of local investigate journalism are the
- the global mail
- crikey
- Australian story
What do we investigate?
Old journalism saying:
“if your mother says she loves you,
check it out”
This quote means that you should always check your facts, assume
nothing, expect whistleblowers to be/go crazy
Types of investigative interaction
- Interviews- whistleblowers, people concerned,
- observations- see what’s going on, don’t get it second hand
- documents- important, online or annual reports
- briefings- by officials
- leaks- whistleblowers,
- trespass- up to your morals, depends on your boss
- theft
investigate methods
- interviewing- numerous interviews
- observing- technical issues, scrutiny of government
Threats to investigative journalism
-Online news, less money less time and therefore less investigative
work.
Also the great debate between Journalism and PR provides a threat towards journalism.
A very interesting book I found when searching through the internet was this one on the history of investigative journalism and how it has differed through cultures.
http://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=JMhmwt6h6G0C&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=investigative+journalism&ots=OXEquZ_gRj&sig=vziHUUgG6W_K4TBT8hKk8nuI3Vo#v=onepage&q=investigative%20journalism&f=false
Also the great debate between Journalism and PR provides a threat towards journalism.
Mostly for these reasons..
http://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=JMhmwt6h6G0C&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=investigative+journalism&ots=OXEquZ_gRj&sig=vziHUUgG6W_K4TBT8hKk8nuI3Vo#v=onepage&q=investigative%20journalism&f=false
Overall, I enjoyed this lecture because I thought we could relate it
more practically to the industry itself and it is easier to see examples of
investigative journalism happening every day. I really enjoyed learning about
what it takes and the different facets of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment